Solid Products of NO2 and O3 Uptake on Methane Flame Soot

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Using a flow reactor with a movable insert and mass-spectrometric control of the gas composition, methane soot samples are treated with O3 and NO2 reagents until the surface is completely poisoned. A solution of the initial methane soot in acetonitrile and solid products of its reaction with oxidizing reagents O3 and NO2 is analyzed using high-resolution mass spectrometry with an electrospray ion source and gas chromatography (GC)–mass spectrometry (MS) with electron ionization. It is established that the original soot contains a number of aromatic compounds, including polycyclic compounds, which are completely consumed in the reaction with these oxidizing agents. Compounds from the paraffin class remain inert with respect to NO2 and O3. The products of the ozonization of prenitrated soot are the same as those of simple ozonation. The number of ozonation products is much higher than similar nitration products. This is the reason for the reactivity of nitrated soot with respect to the ozone uptake.

作者简介

A. Eganov

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: v.zelenov48@gmail.com
Moscow, Russia

D. Kardonsky

Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: v.zelenov48@gmail.com
Moscow, Russia

I. Sulimenkov

Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: v.zelenov48@gmail.com
Moscow, Russia

V. Kozlovskiy

Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: v.zelenov48@gmail.com
Moscow, Russia

E. Aparina

Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: v.zelenov48@gmail.com
Moscow, Russia

V. Zelenov

Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: v.zelenov48@gmail.com
Moscow, Russia

参考

  1. Roberts-Semple D., Song F., Gao Yu. // Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2012. V. 3. P. 247; www.atmospolres.com
  2. Liu Yu., Tang G., Liu B. et al. // Atmos. Environ. 2022. V. 275. P. 119018; https://doi.org/10.1016/jatmosenv.2022.119018
  3. Schumann U., Huntrieser H. // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2007. V. 7. P. 3823; www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/3823/2007/
  4. Washenfelder R.A., Wagner N.L., Dubé W.P., Brown S.S. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011. V. 45. P. 2938; https://doi.org/10.1021/es103340u
  5. Ларин И.К. // Хим. физика. 2019. Т. 38. №5. С. 81; https://doi.org/10.1134/S0207401X1905008X
  6. Ларин И.К., Алоян А.Е., Ермаков А.Н. // Хим. физика. 2021. Т. 40. № 5. С. 86; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X21050095
  7. Ларин И.К. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 5. С. 371; https://doi.org/10/31857/S0207401X22050089
  8. Xiong X., Liu X., Wu W. et al. // Atmos. Environ. 2022. V. 273. P. 118956; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.118956
  9. Aas W., Tsyro S., Bieber E. et al. // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012. V. 12. P. 8073; https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8073-2012
  10. Sharma S.K., Karapurkar S.G., Shenoy D.M., Mandal T.K. // J. Atmos. Chem. 2022. V. 79. P. 67; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-022-09429-0
  11. Berner A., Sidla S., Galambos Z. et al. // J. Geophys. Res. Atmospheres. 1996. V. 101. P. 19559; https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD03425
  12. Pohl K., Cantwell M., Herckes P., Lohmann R. // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014. V. 14. P. 7431; https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7431-2014,2014
  13. Bond T.C., Streets D.G., Yarber K.F. et al. // J. Geophys. Res. 2004. V. 109. D14203; https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003697
  14. Wang R., Tao S., Shen H. et al. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014. V. 48. P. 6780; https://doi.org/10.1021/es5021422
  15. Klimont Z., Kupiainen K., Heyes C. et al. // Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017. V. 17. P. 8681; https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8681-2017
  16. Akhter M.S., Chughtai A.R., Smith D.M. // Applied Spec. 1985. V. 39. P. 143; https://doi.org/10.1366/0003702854249114
  17. Stadler D., Rossi M.J. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000. V. 2. P. 5420; https://doi.org/10.1039/b005680o
  18. Cain J.P., Gassman P.L., Wang H., Laskin A. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010. V. 12. P. 5206; https://doi.org/10.1039/b924344e
  19. Smedley J.M., Williams A., Bartle K.D. // Combust.and Flame 1992. V. 91. P. 71; https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(92)90128-C
  20. Siegmann K., Hepp H., Sattler K. // Combust. Sci. Technol. 1995. V. 109. P. 165; https://doi.org/10.1080/00102209508951900
  21. Onischuk A.A., di Stasio S., Karasev V.V. et al. // Aerosol Sci. 2003. V. 34. P. 383; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(02)00215-X
  22. Dobbings R.A., Fletcher R.A., Chang H.-C. // Combust. and Flame. 1998. V. 115. P. 285; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(98)00010-8
  23. Oktem B., Tolocka M.P., Zhao B. et al. // Combust. and Flame. 2005. V. 142. P. 364; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.03.016
  24. Hafner W.D., Carlson D.L., Hites R.A. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005. V. 39. P. 7374; https://doi.org/10.1021/es0508673
  25. Lang C., Tao S., Liu W. et al. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008. V. 42. P. 5156; https://doi.org/10.1021/es800453n
  26. Li W., Park R., Alexandrou N. et al. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021. V. 55. P. 2254; https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07079
  27. Ringuet J., Albinet A., Leoz-Garziandia E. et al. // Atmos. Environ. 2012. V. 61. P. 15; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.025
  28. Roy R., Jan R., Gunjal G. et al. // Atmos. Environ. 2019. V. 210. P. 47; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.04.034
  29. Liu Y., Liu C., Ma J. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010. V. 12. P. 10896; https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp00402b
  30. Burkholder J.B., Sander S.P., Abbatt J.P.D. et al. “Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies. Evaluation № 19”. Pasadena: NASA JPL Publication 19-5, 2019; http://jpldataeval.jpl.nasa.gov
  31. Akhter M.S., Chughtai A.R., Smith D.M. // J. Phys. Chem. 1984. V. 88. P. 5334; https://doi.org/10.1021/j.150666a046
  32. Smith D.M., Chughtai A.R. // J. Geophys. Res. 1996. V. 101D. P. 19607; https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD03032
  33. Kirchner U., Scheer V., Vogt R. // J. Phys. Chem. A. 2000. V. 104. P. 8908; https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0005322
  34. Han C., Liu Y., He H. // Atmos. Environ. 2013. V. 64. P. 270; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.008
  35. Зеленов В.В., Апарина Е.В. // Хим. физика. 2023. Т. 42. № 1. С. 73; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X23010144
  36. Kozlovski V., Brusov V., Sulimenkov I. et al. // Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2004. V. 18. P. 780; https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1405
  37. www.sisweb.com/software/ms/nist.htm

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载
2.

下载 (81KB)
索引源数据
3.

下载 (83KB)
索引源数据

版权所有 © А.А. Еганов, Д.А. Кардонский, И.В. Сулименков, В.И. Козловский, Е.В. Апарина, В.В. Зеленов, 2023