Air Gasification of Wood at Increased Pressure in the Filtration Combustion Mode

V. M. Kislov; Кислов В. М.; M. V. Tsvetkov; Цветков М. В.; A. Yu. Zaichenko; Зайченко А. Ю.; D. N. Podlesniy; Подлесный Д. Н.; M. V. Salganskaya; Салганская М. В.; Yu. Yu. Tsvetkova; Цветкова Ю. Ю.; E. A. Salgansky; Салганский Е. А.

doi:10.31857/S0207401X2308006X

Air Gasification of Wood at Increased Pressure in the Filtration Combustion Mode

作者: Kislov V.M.¹, Tsvetkov M.V.¹, Zaichenko A.Y.¹, Podlesniy D.N.¹, Salganskaya M.V.¹, Tsvetkova Y.Y.¹, Salgansky E.A.¹
隶属关系:
1. Federal Research Center of Problems of Chemical Physics and Medicinal Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
期: 卷 42, 编号 8 (2023)
页面: 39-44
栏目: Combustion, explosion and shock waves
URL: https://rjeid.com/0207-401X/article/view/674838
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X2308006X
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IGDKWL
ID: 674838

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取

##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问

订阅或者付费存取

详细
作者简介
参考
补充文件
统计

详细

The air gasification of wood at increased pressure in the filtration combustion mode is experimentally studied. It is experimentally shown that increasing the pressure in the reactor (up to 3 atm) during the gasification of wood leads to an increase in the productivity of the experimental setup (by a factor of 1.6), a decrease in the quantity of tars formed (by a factor of 1.5), and a change in the concentrations of outgoing gases. Thermodynamic calculations of the effect of pressure at the stage of wood pyrolysis are carried out. With an increase in pressure from 1 to 9 atm, the volume concentrations of hydrogen and carbon monoxide decrease, while the volume concentrations of the water vapor and carbon dioxide increase. However, at a pyrolysis temperature of 1300 K, an increase in pressure has practically no effect on the composition of gaseous products.

关键词

gasification, pyrolysis, filtration combustion, wood, increased pressure, thermodynamics

参考

Arena U. // Waste Manag. 2012. V. 32. № 4. P. 625; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.09.025
Toledo M., Arriagada A., Ripoll N., Salgansky E.A., Mujeebu M.A. // Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2023. V. 177. ID 113 213; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113213
Герасимов Г.Я., Хасхачих В.В., Сычев Г.А. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 11. С. 24; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22110048
Смирнов В.Н., Шубин Г.А., Арутюнов А.В. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 11. С. 52; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22110115
Van Dyk J.C., Keyser M.J., Coertzen M. // Intern. J. Coal Geol. 2006. V. 65. № 3–4. P. 243; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2005.05.007
Seed M.A., Williams A.R., Brown D.J., Hirschfelder H. // Proc. Third Intern. Conf. on Clean Coal Technologies for our Future. Cagliari, Italy, 2007.
Motta I.L., Miranda N.T., Filho R.M., Maciel M.R.W. // Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2018. V. 94. P. 998; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.042
Кислов В.М., Жолудев А.Ф., Кислов М.Б., Салганский Е.А. // ЖПХ. 2019. Т. 92. № 1. С. 61; https://doi.org/10.1134/S0044461819010080
Asadullah M. // Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2014. V. 40. P. 118; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.132
Cortazar M., Santamaria L., Lopez G. et al. // Energy Convers. Manag. 2023. V. 276. ID 116496; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116496
Mayerhofer M., Mitsakis P., Meng X. et al. // Fuel. 2012. V. 99. P. 204; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.04.022
Wolfesberger U., Aigner I., Hofbauer H. // Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2009. V. 28. № 3. P. 372; https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10387
Knight R.A. // Biomass Bioenerg. 2000. V. 18. № 1. P. 67; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00070-7
Valin S., Ravel S., Guillaudeau J., Thiery S. // Fuel Process. Technol. 2010. V. 91. № 10. P. 1222; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.04.001
Медведев С.П., Иванцов А.Н., Андержанов Э.К. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 12. С. 56;
Tereza A.M., Medvedev S.P., Smirnov V.N. // Acta Astronaut. 2021. V. 181. P. 612; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.09.048
Медведев С.П., Максимова О.Г., Черепанова Т.Т. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 11. С. 73; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22110085
Situmorang Y.A., Zhao Z., Yoshida A., Abudula A., Guan G. // Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2020. V. 117. ID 109 486; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109486
Janajreh I., Adeyemi I., Raza S.S., Ghenai C. // Ibid. 2021. V. 138. ID 110505; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110505
Ruiz G., Ripoll N., Fedorova N. et al. // Intern. J. Heat Mass. Transf. 2019. V. 136. P. 383; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.03.009
Салганский Е.А., Фурсов В.П., Глазов С.В., Салганская М.В., Манелис Г.Б. // Физика горения и взрыва. 2003. Т. 39. № 1. С. 44.
Манелис Г.Б., Глазов С.В., Лемперт Д.Б., Салганский Е.А. // Изв. АН. Сер. хим. 2011. № 7. С. 1278.
Глазов С.В., Полианчик Е.В. // Теорет. основы хим. технологии. 2019. Т. 53. № 2. С. 152; https://doi.org/10.1134/S0040357119020040
Tabrizi F.F., Mousavi S.A.H.S., Atashi H. // Energy Convers. Manag. 2015. V. 103. P. 1065; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.07.005
Цветков М.В., Кислов В.М., Цветкова Ю.Ю. и др. // Хим. физика. 2022. Т. 41. № 8. С. 93; https://doi.org/10.31857/S0207401X22080143
Трусов Б.Г. // Матер. XIV Междунар. конф. по химической термодинамике. Спб: НИИХ СПбГУ, 2002. С. 483.
Salgansky E.A., Kislov V.M., Glazov S.V., Salganskaya M.V. // J. Combustion. 2016. ID 9637082; https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9637082
Kitzler H., Pfeifer C., Hofbauer H. // Fuel Process. Technol. 2011. V. 92. № 5. P. 908; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.12.009
Hoang A.T., Huang Z., Nižetić S. et al. // Intern. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2022. V. 47. № 7. P. 4394; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.091
Habibollahzade A., Ahmadi P., Rosen M.A. // J. Clean. Prod. 2021. V. 284. ID 124718; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124718