Application Of Vanadyl Alkoxoacetylacetonate In Formation Of v2O5 Electrochromic Films

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Crystal structure, morphology and electrochromic properties of V2O5 film, prepared using vanadyl alkoxoacetylacetonate as precursor, were studied. We have shown that the obtained vanadium pentoxide contains significant amount of V4+ cations, which is indicated by low electron work function among other things. This results in material possessing anodic electrochromism – coloring upon oxidation – with rapid bleaching process (1 s upon necessary potential application). Anodic coloration is observed in the whole visible light spectrum, as well as in near IR region up to 1100 nm. Obtained data show high prospects for approach to formation of V2O5-based films using vanadyl acetylacetonate as precursor and application of such films as components of smart windows and displays, optical properties of which could be controlled by electrical current application.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

P. Gorobtsov

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: phigoros@gmail.com
Rússia, Moscow, 119991

N. Simonenko

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: phigoros@gmail.com
Rússia, Moscow, 119991

A. Mokrushin

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: phigoros@gmail.com
Rússia, Moscow, 119991

E. Simonenko

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: phigoros@gmail.com
Rússia, Moscow, 119991

N. Kuznetsov

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: phigoros@gmail.com
Rússia, Moscow, 119991

Bibliografia

  1. Granqvist C.G. // Thin Solid Films. 2014. V. 564. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.002
  2. Mortimer R.J. // Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2011. V. 41. № 1. P. 241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-062910-100344
  3. Gu C., Jia A.B., Zhang Y.M. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2022. V. 122. № 18. P. 14679. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c01055
  4. Mortimer R.J., Dyer A.L., Reynolds J.R. // Displays. 2006. V. 27. № 1. P. 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2005.03.003
  5. Ataalla M., Afify A.S., Hassan M. et al. // J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2018. V. 491. P. 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.03.050
  6. Wojcik P.J., Santos L., Pereira L. et al. // Nanoscale. 2015. V. 7. № 5. P. 1696. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4nr05765a
  7. Wen R.T., Niklasson G.A., Granqvist C.G. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015. V. 7. № 18. P. 9319. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b01715
  8. Liu Q., Chen Q., Zhang Q. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C: Mater. 2018. V. 6. № 3. P. 646. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7tc04696k
  9. Avendaño E., Berggren L., Niklasson G.A. et al. // Thin Solid Films. 2006. V. 496. № 1. P. 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2005.08.183
  10. Xiong C., Aliev A.E., Gnade B. et al. // ACS Nano. 2008. V. 2. № 2. P. 293. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn700261c
  11. Scherer M.R.J., Li L., Cunha P.M.S. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2012. V. 24. № 9. P. 1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201104272
  12. Costa C., Pinheiro C., Henriques I. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2012. V. 4. № 10. P. 5266. https://doi.org/10.1021/am301213b
  13. Mjejri I., Gaudon M., Rougier A. // Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 2019. V. 198. № December 2018. P. 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.04.010
  14. Kozlov D.A., Kozlova T.O., Shcherbakov A.B. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2020. V. 65. № 7. P. 1088. https://doi.org/10.1134/S003602362007013X
  15. Parshina L.S., Novodvorsky O.A. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. № 8. P. 1234. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621080209
  16. Jin A., Chen W., Zhu Q. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2010. V. 55. № 22. P. 6408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.06.047
  17. Zanarini S., Di Lupo F., Bedini A. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C: Mater. 2014. V. 2. № 42. P. 8854. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4tc01123f
  18. Gorobtsov F.Yu., Simonenko T.L., Simonenko N.P. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022. V. 67. № 7. P. 1094. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023622070105
  19. Liu Q., Li Z.F., Liu Y. et al. // Nat. Commun. 2015. V. 6. P. 6127. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7127
  20. Meyer J., Zilberberg K., Riedl T. et al. // J. Appl. Phys. 2011. V. 110. № 3. P. 033710. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.361139
  21. Chen C.P., Chen Y.D., Chuang S.C. // Adv. Mater. 2011. V. 23. № 33. P. 3859. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201102142
  22. Matamura Y., Ikenoue T., Miyake M. et al. // Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 2021. V. 230. P. 111287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111287
  23. Piccirillo C., Binions R., Parkin I.P. // Chem. Vap. Deposition. 2007. V. 13. № 4. P. 145. https://doi.org/10.1002/cvde.200606540
  24. Simonenko T.L., Simonenko N.P., Gorobtsov P.Y. et al. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021. V. 66. № 9. P. 1416. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621090138
  25. Gorobtsov P.Yu., Simonenko T.L., Simonenko N.P. et al. // Colloids Interfaces. 2023. V. 7. № 1. P. 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/colloids7010020
  26. Gorobtsov P.Yu., Mokrushin A.S., Simonenko T.L. et al. // Materials. 2022. V. 15. № 21. P. 7837. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15217837
  27. Gorobtsov P.Y., Fisenko N.A., Solovey V.R. et al. // Colloids Interface Sci. Commun. 2021. V. 43. P. 100452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colcom.2021.100452
  28. Zhou B., He D. // J. Raman Spectrosc. 2008. V. 39. № 10. P. 1475. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.2025
  29. Baddour-Hadjean R., Marzouk A., Pereira-Ramos J.P. // J. Raman Spectrosc. 2012. V. 43. № 1. P. 153. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.2984
  30. Clauws P., Broeckx J., Vennik J. // Phys. Status Solidi B. 1985. V. 131. № 2. P. 459. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2221310207
  31. Abello L., Husson E., Repelin Y. et al. // Spectrochim. Acta. 1983. V. 39A. № 7. P. 641. https://doi.org/10.1016/0584-8539(83)80040-3
  32. Schilbe P. // Physica B. 2002. V. 316-317. P. 600. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526(02)00584-7
  33. Wei J., Ji H., Guo W. et al. // Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012. V. 7. № 6. P. 357. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.70
  34. Ji Y., Zhang Y., Gao M. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2014. V. 4. P. 4854. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04854
  35. Botto I.L., Vassallo M.B., Baran E.J. et al. // Mater. Chem. Phys. 1997. V. 50. P. 267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(97)01940-8
  36. Bodurov G., Ivanova T., Abrashev M. et al. // Phys. Procedia. 2013. V. 46. P. 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2013.07.054
  37. Vedeanu N., Cozar O., Stanescu R. et al. // J. Mol. Struct. 2013. V. 1044. P. 323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2013.01.078
  38. Zhang H., Wang S., Sun X. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C: Mater. 2017. V. 5. № 4. P. 817. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6tc04050k
  39. Choi S.G., Seok H.J., Rhee S. et al. // J. Alloys Compd. 2021. V. 878. P. 160303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160303
  40. Peng H., Sun W., Li Y. et al. // Nano Res. 2016. V. 9. № 10. P. 2960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-016-1181-z
  41. Vernardou D. // Coatings. 2017. V. 7. № 2. P. 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings7020024
  42. Iida Y., Kaneko Y., Kanno Y. // J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2008. V. 197. № 1–3. P. 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.032
  43. Tong Z., Hao J., Zhang K. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. C: Mater. 2014. V. 2. № 18. P. 3651. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3tc32417f
  44. Jin A., Chen W., Zhu Q. et al. // Thin Solid Films. 2009. V. 517. № 6. P. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2008.10.001
  45. Cholant C.M., Westphal T.M., Balboni R.D.C. et al. // J. Solid State Electrochem. 2017. V. 21. № 5. P. 1509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-016-3491-1
  46. Patil C.E., Tarwal N.L., Jadhav P.R. et al. // Curr. Appl. Phys. 2014. V. 14. № 3. P. 389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2013.12.014
  47. Panagopoulou M., Vernardou D., Koudoumas E. et al. // J. Phys. Chem. C. 2017. V. 121. № 1. P. 70. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b09018
  48. Panagopoulou M., Vernardou D., Koudoumas E. et al. // Electrochim. Acta. 2019. V. 321. P. 134743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134743
  49. Koo B.R., Bae J.W., Ahn H.J. // Ceram. Int. 2019. V. 45. № 9. P. 12325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.03.148
  50. Surca A.K., Dražić G., Mihelčič M. // Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 2019. V. 196. P. 185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.03.017

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. Fig. 1. Diffractogram of the formed V2O5 film. The asterisk indicates reflexes related to the sublayer of a transparent electrode based on indium tin oxide.

Baixar (221KB)
Metadados
3. Fig. 2. Results of Raman (a) and IR spectroscopy (b) of the formed V2O5 film. The asterisk on the Raman spectrum indicates modes related to vibrations involving the V4+ cation. IR spectrum 1 refers to a pure glass substrate with a transparent electrode sublayer, IR spectrum 2 refers to a substrate with a V2O5 film applied.

Baixar (160KB)
Metadados
4. Fig. 3. AFM results of the obtained V2O5 film: a, b, c – topographic images, d – surface potential distribution map.

Baixar (646KB)
Metadados
5. Fig. 4. Results of measuring the electrochromic properties of the V2O5 film: a – CVA recorded with a potential change rate of 100 mV/s; b – a change in the transmission coefficient of an electrochromic cell based on the V2O5 film at a wavelength of 450 nm and a potential sweep during CVA recording; c – a change in the transmission coefficient of the cell at a wavelength of 450 nm and exposure for 3 minutes at 2.5 and -3.5 V; g are the transmission spectra of the cell in the visible and near-INFRARED ranges before the start of measurements and after 3 minutes of exposure at different potential values.

Baixar (325KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024