Spatial Computer Model of the UCl 3 –NaCl–MgCl 2 –PuCl 3  Isobaric Phase Diagram

V. P. Vorob’eva; Воробьева В. П.; A. E. Zelenaya; Зеленая А. Э.; V. I. Lutsyk; Луцык В. И.; M. V. Lamueva; Ламуева М. В.

doi:10.31857/S0044457X23600780

Spatial Computer Model of the UCl₃–NaCl–MgCl₂–PuCl₃ Isobaric Phase Diagram

Authors: Vorob’eva V.P.¹, Zelenaya A.E.¹, Lutsyk V.I.¹, Lamueva M.V.¹
Affiliations:
1. Institute of Physical Materials Science, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue: Vol 68, No 11 (2023)
Pages: 1626-1636
Section: ФИЗИКО-ХИМИЧЕСКИЙ АНАЛИЗ НЕОРГАНИЧЕСКИХ СИСТЕМ
URL: https://rjeid.com/0044-457X/article/view/666152
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X23600780
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YZXQVU
ID: 666152

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

A four-dimensional (4D, in concentration–temperature coordinates) computer model of the isobaric phase diagram of uranium, sodium, magnesium, and plutonium chlorides, as well as four three-dimensional (3D) computer models of the phase diagrams of the ternary systems forming it, has been constructed. The technology of assembling a 4D model of 46 hypersurfaces and 17 phase regions was used in the design. The obtained 4D model of the UCl3–NaCl–MgCl2–PuCl3 phase diagram makes it possible to visualize a four-dimensional object as a whole (with all its hypersurfaces and phase regions) by any arbitrarily given 2D and 3D sections, as well as it is able to reproduce published (experimental or thermodynamically calculated) 2D sections. The scope of application of the results of the work is the development of materials for fuel components of fourth-generation molten salt reactors and pyrochemical recycling of spent fuel rods. For the first time, a comprehensive, complete description of phase diagrams composed of uranium, plutonium, sodium, and magnesium chlorides has been obtained.

Keywords

molten salt reactor, phase diagram, computer simulation, visualization of four-dimensional, space objects, uranium chloride, sodium chloride, magnesium chloride, plutonium chloride

References

Yin H., Wu S., Wang X. et al // J. Fluor. Chem. 2019. V. 217. P. 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2018.09.008
Федоров П.П. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2021. Т. 66. № 2. С. 250. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X21020070
Mourogov A., Bokov P.M. // Energy Convers. Manage. 2006. V. 47. P. 2761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.02.013
Pelton A.D., Chartrand P. // Metall. Mater. Trans. A. 2001. V. 32A. P. 1361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-001-0227-2
Trnovcova V., Garashina L.S., Skubla A. et al // Solid State Ionics. 2003. V. 157. P. 195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00209-6
Федоров П.П., Бучинская И.И., Бондарева О.С. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2000. Т. 45. № 6. С. 1054.
Beneš O., Konings R.J.M. // J. Nucl. Mater. 2008. V. 375. P. 202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.01.007
Beneš O. Thermodynamics of Molten Salts for Nuclear Applications. PhD, Diss. Prague, Chech Rep. 2008. 205 p.
Bulavin L., Plevachuk Yu., Sklyarchuk V. et al. // J. Nucl. Mater. 2013. V. 433. P. 329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.08.045
Yin H., Wu X., Ling C. et al. // CALPHAD. 2022. V. 77. 102427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2022.102427
Yin H., Lin J., Hu B. et al. // CALPHAD. 2020. V. 70. 101783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101783
Yingling J.A., Schorne-Pinto J., Aziziha M. et al. // J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2023. V. 179. 106974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2022.106974
Beneš O., van der Meer J.P.M., Konings R.J.M. // CALPHAD. 2007. V. 31. P. 209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2006.12.004
Beneš O., Konings R.J.M. // J. Nucl. Mater. 2008. V. 377. P. 449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.04.004
Beneš O., Konings R.J.M. // CALPHAD. 2008. V. 32. P. 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2007.07.006
van der Meer J.P.M., Konings R.J.M., Oonk H.A.J. // J. Nucl. Mater. 2006. V. 357. P. 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.05.042
Савчук Р.Н., Файдюк Н.В., Омельчук А.А. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2014. Т. 59. № 6. С. 780. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0044457X1406018X
Пономарев Л.И., Серегин М.Б., Михаличенко А.А. и др. // Атомная энергия. 2012. Т. 112. № 6. С. 341.
Masset P., Konings R.J.M., Malmbeck R. et al. // J. Nucl. Mater. 2005. V. 344. P. 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.04.038
Murakami T., Rodrigues A., Ougier M. et al. // J. Nucl. Mater. 2015. V. 466. P. 502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.045
Ghosh S., Ganesan R., Sridharan R. et al. // Thermochim. Acta. 2017. V. 653. P. 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2017.03.024
Воробьева В.П., Зеленая А.Э., Луцык В.И. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2023. Т. 68. № 8. С. 1090. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X23600524
Fredrickson G.L., Yoo T.-S. // J. Nucl. Mater. 2020. V. 528. P. 151883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151883
Vorob'eva V.P., Zelenaya A.E., Lutsyk V.I. et al. // J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 2021. V. 42. P. 175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11669-021-00863-3
Prince A. Alloy Phase Equilibria. Amsterdam–London–New York: Elsevier Publ. Comp., 1966. 290 p.
Connell R.G. // J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 1994. V. 15. № 1. P. 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11669-021-00863-3
Lutsyk V.I., Vorob’eva V.P. // J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2010. V. 101. № 1. P. 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-010-0855-0
Lukas H.L., Henig E.T., Petzow G. // Z. Metallkd. 1986. V. 77. P. 360.