Possibilities and Prospects for the Use of Distributed Fiber Sensors in Geophysics
- Authors: Nikitin S.P.1,2, Kislov K.V.3, Starovoit Y.O.1, Bengalskii D.M.1, Spiridonov E.P.1, Kharasov D.R.1, Fomiryakov E.A.1,4, Nanii O.E.1,4, Treshchikov V.N.1
- 
							Affiliations: 
							- OOO T8
- OOO Femtovision
- Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences (ITPZ RAS)
- Moscow State University, Department of Physics
 
- Issue: No 5 (2023)
- Pages: 153-158
- Section: ФИЗИЧЕСКИЕ ПРИБОРЫ ДЛЯ ЭКОЛОГИИ, МЕДИЦИНЫ, БИОЛОГИИ
- URL: https://rjeid.com/0032-8162/article/view/670427
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S0032816223050191
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZVBDKA
- ID: 670427
Cite item
Abstract
A brief review of the applications of distributed acoustic sensors for solving geophysical and seismometric problems is given. Theoretical estimates and experimental measurements of the level of self-noise in distributed acoustic sensors, including those at subhertz frequencies, are obtained. Numerical modeling has been carried out, which makes it possible to quantify the power of low-frequency noise (associated with a slow temperature change of the probed fiber) in the signal of distributed acoustic sensors. The obtained results are supplemented by theoretical estimates of the power spectrum of a signal from a distant earthquake; they demonstrate the importance of taking into account temperature effects in the fiber when planning experiments related to the registration of weak seismic events.
About the authors
S. P. Nikitin
OOO T8; OOO Femtovision
														Email: nikitin@t8.ru
				                					                																			                												                								107076, Moscow, Russia; 107076, Moscow, Russia						
K. V. Kislov
Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences (ITPZ RAS)
														Email: nikitin@t8.ru
				                					                																			                												                								117997, Moscow, Russia						
Yu. O. Starovoit
OOO T8
														Email: nikitin@t8.ru
				                					                																			                												                								107076, Moscow, Russia						
D. M. Bengalskii
OOO T8
														Email: nikitin@t8.ru
				                					                																			                												                								107076, Moscow, Russia						
E. P. Spiridonov
OOO T8
														Email: nikitin@t8.ru
				                					                																			                												                								107076, Moscow, Russia						
D. R. Kharasov
OOO T8
														Email: nikitin@t8.ru
				                					                																			                												                								107076, Moscow, Russia						
E. A. Fomiryakov
OOO T8; Moscow State University, Department of Physics
														Email: nikitin@t8.ru
				                					                																			                												                								107076, Moscow, Russia; 119991, Moscow, Russia						
O. E. Nanii
OOO T8; Moscow State University, Department of Physics
														Email: nikitin@t8.ru
				                					                																			                												                								107076, Moscow, Russia; 119991, Moscow, Russia						
V. N. Treshchikov
OOO T8
							Author for correspondence.
							Email: nikitin@t8.ru
				                					                																			                												                								107076, Moscow, Russia						
References
- Ide S., Araki E., Matsumoto H. // Earth Planets Space. 2021. V. 73. P. 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021-01385-5
- Shragge J., Yang J., Issa N., Roelens M., Dentith M., Schediwy S. // Geophys. J. Intern. 2021. V. 226. P. 564. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggab111
- Fang G., Li Y.E., Zhao Y., Martin E.R. // Geophys. Res. Lett. 2020. V. 47. Art. e2019GL086115. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086115
- Spica Z.J., Perton M., Martin E.R., Beroza G.C., Biondi B. // J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth. 2020. V. 125. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018656
- Tonegawa T., Araki E., Matsumoto H., Kimura T., Obana K., Fujie G., Arai R., Shiraishi K., Nakano M., Nakamura Y., Yokobiki T., Kodaira S. // Geophys. Research Lett. 2022. V. 49. Iss. 4. Art. e2022GL098162. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098162
- Smolinski K., Paitz P., Bowden D., Edme P., Kugler F., Fichtner A. // EGU General Assembly, 2020. EGU2020-8225. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-8225
- Li Z., Shen Z., Yang Y., Williams E., Wang X., Zhan Z. // AGU Advances. 2021. № 2. Art. e2021AV000395. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021AV000395
- Binder G., Titov A., Liu Y., Simmons J., Tura A., Byerley G., Monk D. // Geophysics. 2020. V. 85. P. T225. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2019-0819.1
- Hartog A.H. In Optical Fibre Sensors: Fundamentals for Development of Optimized Devices. / Eds. Del Villar I., Matias I.R. Hoboken. NJ. John Wiley & Sons. 2020. P. 151. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119534730.ch6
- Naldrett G., Parker T., Shatalin S., Mondanos M. // First Break. 2020. V. 38. P. 71. https://doi.org/10.3997/1365-2397.fb2020012
- Popik S., Pevzner R., Bona A., Tertyshnikov K., Glubokovskikh S., Gurevich B. // Geophys. Prospect. 2021. V. 69. P. 842. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.13080
- Tribaldos V.R., Ajo-Franklin J.B. // J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth. 2021. V. 126. Art. e2020JB021004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB021004
- Agostinetti N.P., Villa A., Saccorotti G. // Solid Earth. 2022. V. 13. P. 449. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-449-2022
- Huff O., Lellouch A., Luo B., Jin G., Biondi B. // Lead. Edge. 2020. V. 39. P. 776. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle39110776.1
- Min R., Liu Z., Pereira L., Yang C., Sui Q., Marques C. // Opt. Laser Technol. 2021. V. 140. Art. 107082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2021.107082
- Lior I., Rivet D., Ampuero J.P., Sladen A., Barrientos S., Sánchez-Ollavaria R., Opazo G.A.V., Prado J.A.B. // Sci. Rep. 2023. V. 13. P. 424. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27444-3
- Faucher F., de Hoop M.V., Scherzer O. // Geophysics. 2021. V. 86. P. R21. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2020-0305.1
- Nayak A., Ajo-Franklin J. // Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer. 2021. V. 111. P. 3432. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120210028
- Distributed acoustic sensing in geophysics: Methods and applications / Eds. Li Y., Karrenbach M., Ajo-Franklin J. 2022. Vol. 268. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-1-119-52179-2. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119521808
- Lindsey N.J., Rademacher H., Ajo-Franklin J.B. // J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth. 2020. V. 125. Art. e2019JB018145. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018145
- Jousset P., Reinsch T., Ryberg T., Blanck H., Clarke A., Aghayev R., Krawczyk C.M. // Nature commun. 2018. V. 9. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04860-y
- Kislov K.V., Gravirov V.V. // Seismic Instruments. 2022. V. 5. P. 485. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923922050085
- Brune, J. N. // J. Geoph. Res. 1970. V. 75. P. 4997. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB075i026p04997
- Aki K., Richards P. Quantitative Seismology. 2nd Ed. University Science Books. 2002. https://lccn.loc.gov/2002071360
- Ackerley N. // CSEG GeoConvention Vision. 2012. Article #90174.
- Borcherdt R.D., Johnston M.J.S., Glassmoyer G. // Bull. Seism. Soc. America. 1989. V. 79. P. 1006. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0790041006
- Beavan R.J., Goulty N.R. // Geophys. J. Intern. 1977. V. 48. P. 293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1977.tb03673.x
- Hubbard P.G., Vantassel J.P., Cox B.R., Rector J.W., Yust M.B.S., Soga K. // Sensors. 2022. V. 22. P. 4589. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22124589
- Peterson J. Open-file report 93-322. U. S. Geological Survey, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 1993. http://opg.sscc.ru/attachments/073_ofr93-322.pdf
- Alekseev A.E., Tezadov Y.A., Potapov V.T. // Laser Phys. 2017. V. 27. P. 055101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1555-6611/aa6378
- Nikitin S., Fomiryakov E., Kharasov D., Nanii O., Treshchikov V. // J. Lightwave Technol. 2019. V. 38. P. 1446. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2019.2952688
- Bertholds A., Dandliker R. // J. Lightwave Technol. 1988. V. 6. P. 17. https://doi.org/10.1109/50.3956
- Koheras BASIK – single-frequency fiber lasers. https://www.nktphotonics.com/products/single-frequency-fiber-lasers/koheras-basik/
- ORION 1550 nm Laser Module. https://rio-lasers.com/laser-products/
- Gorshko B.G., Alekseev A.E., Taranov M.A., Simikin D.E., Potapov V.T., Ilinskiy D.A. // Appl. Opt. 2022. V. 61. P. 8308. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.468804
- Fomiryakov E., Kharasov D., Nikitin S., Nanii O., Treshchikov V. // J Lightwave Technol. 2021. V. 39. P. 5191. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2021.3082263
- Nikitin S.P., Kuzmenkov A.I., Gorbulenko V.V., Nanii O.E., Treshchikov V.N. // Laser Phys. 2018. V. 28. P. 085107. https://doi.org/10.1088/1555-6611/aac714
- Shatalin S., Parker T., Farhadiroushan M. Distributed Acoustic Sensing in Geophysics: Methods and Applications. 2021. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119521808.ch1
- Фомиряков Э.А., Бенгальский Д.М., Харасов Д.Р., Наний О.Е., Никитин С.П., Трещиков В.Н. // Автометрия. 2023. Т. 59. № 1. С. 87. https://doi.org/10.15372/AUT20230109
- Global DAS monitoring month February 2023. https://www.norsar.no/in-focus/global-das-monitoring-month-february-2023. Wuestefeld A., Spica Z.J., Aderhold K. et al. // The Global DAS Campaign of 2023, submitted to Seismol. Res. Lett. (2023).
Supplementary files
 
				
			 
					 
						 
						 
						 
						 
									

 
  
  
  Email this article
			Email this article 
 Open Access
		                                Open Access Access granted
						Access granted Subscription or Fee Access
		                                							Subscription or Fee Access
		                                					
