Chain-melting phase transition in a lamellar film of dimyristoyl-phosphatidylserine on the surface of a silica hydrosol

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Structural dynamics of multilayer of dimyristoyl-phosphatidylserine formed on the surface of silica sol with 5 nm nanoparticles size has been investigated by X-ray reflectometry and grazing-incidence diffraction at 71 keV photon energy. Combined model-based and modelless analysis of reflectometry data revealed the structure consisting of a surface monolayer and a stack of lamellar bilayers sandwiched between water layers, with a spatial period of ~ 150 Å. With increase in temperature above the chain-melting point the surface monolayer is observed to transition from a surface crystal phase with minimal area-per-lipid value of (40 ± 1) Å2 to a disordered liquid phase with estimated area-per-lipid value of (52 ± 2) Å2. Under low temperatures both monolayer and bilayer slabs contain 5 to 8 H2O molecules bound to lipid PS-fragment; however, above the melting point the amount of contained water rises to about 14 molecules per bilayer headgroup.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

A. Tikhonov

P.L. Kapitza Institute for Physical Problems Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: tikhonov@kapitza.ras.ru
Rússia, Moscow

Yu. Volkov

Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography of Kurchatov Complex of Crystallography and Photonics of NRC “Kurchatov Institute”

Email: tikhonov@kapitza.ras.ru
Rússia, Moscow

A. Nuzhdin

Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography of Kurchatov Complex of Crystallography and Photonics of NRC “Kurchatov Institute”

Email: tikhonov@kapitza.ras.ru
Rússia, Moscow

B. Roshchin

Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography of Kurchatov Complex of Crystallography and Photonics of NRC “Kurchatov Institute”

Email: tikhonov@kapitza.ras.ru
Rússia, Moscow

V. Asadchikov

Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography of Kurchatov Complex of Crystallography and Photonics of NRC “Kurchatov Institute”

Email: tikhonov@kapitza.ras.ru
Rússia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Small D.M. The Physical Chemistry of Lipids. New York: Plenum Press, 1986.
  2. Möhwald H. // Handbook of Biological Physics / Eds. Lipowsky R., Sackmann E. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 1995. P. 161.
  3. Stefaniu C., Brezesinski G., Möhwald H. // Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014. V. 208. P. 197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2014.02.013
  4. Needham D., McIntosh T.J., Evans E. // Biochemistry 1988. V. 27. № 13. P. 4668. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00413a013
  5. Blodgett K.B., Langmuir I. // Phys. Rev. 1937. V. 51. № 11. P. 964. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.51.964
  6. Johnson S.J., Bayerl T.M., McDermott D.C. et al. // Biophys. J. 1991. V. 59. № 2. P. 289. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(91)82222-6
  7. Théato P., Zentel R. // Langmuir. 2000. V. 16. № 4. P. 1801. https://doi.org/10.1021/la990292l
  8. Basu J.K., Sanyal M.K. // Phys. Rep. 2002. V. 363. № 1. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00083-7
  9. Koo J., Park S., Satija S. et al. // J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008. V. 318. № 1. P. 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.09.079
  10. Kaganer V.M., Möhwald H., Dutta P. // Rev. Mod. Phys. 1999. V. 71. № 3. P. 779. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.71.779
  11. Kucerka N., Liu Y., Chu N. et al. // Biophys. J. 2005. V. 88. № 4. P. 2626. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.056606
  12. Тихонов А.М. // Письма в ЖЭТФ 2010. Т. 92. № 5. С. 394. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364010170182
  13. Tikhonov A.M. // J. Chem. Phys. 2009. V. 130. № 2. P. 024512. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3056663
  14. Тихонов А.М., Асадчиков В.Е., Волков Ю.О. и др. // ЖЭТФ 2021. T. 159. № 1. C. 5. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044451021010016
  15. Тихонов А.М., Асадчиков В.Е., Волков Ю.О. и др. // Письма в ЖЭТФ 2016. Т. 104. № 12. С. 880. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364016240139
  16. Тихонов А.М., Асадчиков В.Е., Волков Ю.О. // Письма в ЖЭТФ. 2015. Т. 102. № 7. С. 530. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364015190157
  17. Helm C.A., Tippmann-Krayer P., Möhwald H. et al. // Biophys. J. 1991. V. 60. № 6. P. 1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(91)82182-8
  18. Delcea M., Helm C.A. // Langmuir 2019. V. 35. № 26. P. 8519. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b04315
  19. Chen X., Lenhert S., Hirtz M. et al. // Acc. Chem. Res. 2007. V. 40. № 6. P. 393. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar600019r
  20. Purrucker O., Förtig A., Lüdtke K. et al. // J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005. V. 127. № 4. P. 1258. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja045713m
  21. Kaur H., Yadav S., Srivastava A.K. et al. // Sci. Rep. 2016. V. 6. P. 34095. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34095
  22. Lewis R.N., McElhaney R.N. // Biophys. J. 2000. V. 79. № 4. P. 2043. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(00)76452-6
  23. Kozhevnikov I.V. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A. 2003. V. 508. № 3. P. 519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01512-2
  24. Тихонов А.М., Асадчиков В.Е., Волков Ю.О. и др. // Приборы и техника эксперимента. 2021. Т. 64. № 1. С. 1. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441221010139
  25. Honkimäki V., Reichert H., Okasinski J.S., Dosch H. // J. Synchrotron Rad. 2006. V. 13. № 6. P. 426. https://doi.org/10.1107/s0909049506031438
  26. Ponchut C., Rigal J.M., Clément J. et al. // J. Instrumentation. 2011. V. 6. P. C01069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/6/01/C01069
  27. Kozhevnikov I.V., Peverini L., Ziegler E. // Phys. Rev. B. 2012. V. 85. № 12. P. 125439. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.125439
  28. Wong P. // Phys. Rev. B. 1985. V. 32. № 11. P. 7417. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.32.7417
  29. Kanwal R.P. Generalized Functions: Theory and Technique. 2nd ed. Boston: Birkhäuser Verlag, 1998.
  30. Parratt L.G. // Phys. Rev. 1954. V. 95. № 2. P. 359. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.95.359
  31. Nocedal J., Wright S. Numerical Optimizaton. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2006.
  32. Oliphant T.E. // Comput. Sci. Eng. 2007. V. 9. № 3. P. 10. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.58
  33. Henke B.L., Gullikson E.M., Davis J.C. // Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables. 1993. V. 54. № 2. P. 181. https://doi.org/10.1006/adnd.1993.1013
  34. Als-Nielsen J., Jacquemain D., Kjaer K. et al. // Phys. Rep. 1994. V. 246. № 5. P. 251. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(94)90046-9
  35. Möhwald H. // Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1990. V. 41. P. 441. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.41.100190.002301
  36. Hanley L., Choi Y., Fuoco E.R. et al. // Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B. 2003. V. 203. P. 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-583X(02)02183-3
  37. Buff F.P., Lovett R.A., Stillinger F.H. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1965. V. 15. № 15. P. 621. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.15.621
  38. Braslau A., Deutsch M., Pershan P.S. et al. // Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985. V. 54. № 2. P. 114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.114
  39. Als-Nielsen J. // J. Phys. B. Condens. Matter. 1985. V. 61. № 4. P. 411. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303545
  40. Schalke M., Lösche M. // Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000. V. 88. № 1–2. P. 243. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0001-8686(00)00047-6
  41. Тихонов А.М. // ЖЭТФ. 2020. Т. 131. № 5 (11). С. 821. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776120100088
  42. Tostmann H., DiMasi E., Pershan P.S. et al. // Phys. Rev. B. 1999. V. 59. № 2. P. 783. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.783
  43. Pandit S.A., Berkowitz M.L. // Biophys. J. 2002. V. 82. № 4. P. 1818. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75532-x
  44. Petrache H.I., Tristram-Nagle S., Gawrisch K. et al. // Biophys. J. 2004. V. 86. № 3. P. 1574. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3495(04)74225-3
  45. Loʹpez Cascales J., García de la Torre J., Marrink S.J., Berendsen H.J. // J. Chem. Phys. 1996. V. 104. № 7. P. 2713. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470992
  46. Ermakov Y.A., Asadchikov V.E., Roschin B.S. et al. // Langmuir 2019. V. 35. № 38. P. 12326. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01450
  47. Tarek M. // Biophys. J. 2005. V. 88. № 6. P. 4045. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.050617
  48. Ruocco M.J., Shipley G.G. // Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1982. V. 691. № 2. P. 309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(82)90420-5
  49. Асадчиков В.Е., Волков В.В., Волков Ю.О. и др. // Письма в ЖЭТФ 2011. Т. 94. № 7. С. 625. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364011190040
  50. Cevc G., Watts A., Marsh D. // Biochemistry. 1981. V. 20. № 17. P. 4955. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00520a023
  51. Demel R.A., Paltauf F., Hauser H. // Biochemistry 1987. V. 26. № 26. P. 8659. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi00400a025
  52. Danauskas S.M., Ratajczak M.K., Ishitsuka Y. et al. // Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2007. V. 78. № 10. P. 103705. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2796147

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. Fig. 1. X-ray reflectivity curves R(qz) for a DMPS multilayer on a silica hydrosol surface with 5 nm nanoparticles. Curves 1–5 correspond to data obtained at T ≈ 23, 28, 34, 37, and 40°C, respectively. Solid and dashed lines correspond to the results of model-free and model reconstruction, respectively. Inset: X-ray scattering kinematics at the air–sol interface.

Baixar (200KB)
Metadados
3. Fig. 2. Integrated intensity of grazing diffraction ID(q||) from DMPS multilayer. Circles and squares represent data obtained at 23 (1) and 40°C (2), respectively. The solid line illustrates the approximation of the diffraction peak by the Gaussian function.

Baixar (169KB)
Metadados
4. Fig. 3. Electron density profiles ρ(z) calculated within the model-independent (solid lines) and model (dashed lines) approaches. Curves 1–5 correspond to data obtained at T ≈ 23, 28, 34, 37, and 40°C, respectively. For convenience, the curves are shifted along the ordinate axis. The values ​​are normalized to the electron density of water under normal conditions ρw = 0.333 e/Å–3.

Baixar (128KB)
Metadados
5. Fig. 4. Chemical structure of the ionized DMPS molecule. Hydrophobic components are shown as dotted lines.

Baixar (65KB)
Metadados
6. Fig. 5. Structural model of a multilayer DMPS film constructed based on the analysis of model-free calculations.

Baixar (130KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024