电邮这篇文章 INFLUENCE OF INTRAMOLECULAR DONOR-ACCEPTOR INTERACTIONS ON RADIOLYSIS OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS: EFFECTS IN ACETYLACETONE
- 作者: Vlasov S.I.1, Ponomarev A.V.1, Ershov B.G.1
-
隶属关系:
- A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
- 期: 卷 510, 编号 1 (2023)
- 页面: 69-73
- 栏目: PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY
- URL: https://rjeid.com/2686-9535/article/view/651977
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2686953523600174
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YRXCAM
- ID: 651977
如何引用文章
开放存取
##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
订阅或者付费存取
详细
Using acetylacetone as an example, it was shown that the intramolecular hydrogen bond significantly affects the radiolytic transformations of organic compounds, suppressing the transfer of a proton from the primary radical cation to the molecule, and also contributing to the cleavage of the C–OH bond in the enol form. Due to these effects, the main heavy product of radiolysis at 295 K is 4-oxopent-2-en-2-yl acetate. Under boiling conditions (413 K), hydrogen bonds are eliminated, leading to the predominant formation of 4-hydroxy-2-pentanone, which is not detected at 295 K.
作者简介
S. Vlasov
A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: ponomarev@ipc.rssi.ru
Russian,
119071, Moscow
A. Ponomarev
A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: ponomarev@ipc.rssi.ru
Russian,
119071, Moscow
B. Ershov
A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences
Email: ponomarev@ipc.rssi.ru
Russian,
119071, Moscow
参考
- Belova N.V., Oberhammer H., Trang N.H., Girichev G. V. // J. Org. Chem. 2014. V. 79. P. 5412–5419. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo402814c
- Antonov I., Voronova K., Chen M.-W., Sztáray B., Hemberger P., Bodi A., Osborn D.L., Sheps L. // J. Phys. Chem. A. 2019. V. 123. P. 5472–5490. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b04640
- Imatdinova D.N., Vlasov S.I., Ponomarev A.V. // Mendeleev Commun. 2021. V 31. P. 558–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2021.07.041
- Howard D.L., Kjaergaard H.G., Huang J., Meuwly M. // J. Phys. Chem. A. 2015. V. 119. P. 7980–7990. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b01863
- Curran H.J. // Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2006. V. 38. P. 250–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.20153
- Ponomarev A.V., Kholodkova E.M. // Mendeleev Commun. 2018. V. 28. P. 375–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2018.07.011
- Wang H., Bozzelli J.W. // ChemPhysChem. 2016. V. 17. P. 1983–1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201600152
- Yoon M.-C., Choi Y.S., Kim S.K. // J. Chem. Phys. 1999. V. 110. P. 11850–11855. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.479126
- Messaadia L., El Dib G., Ferhati A., Chakir A. // Chem. Phys. Lett. 2015. V. 626. P. 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2015.02.032
- Ji Y., Qin D., Zheng J., Shi Q., Wang J., Lin Q., Chen J., Gao Y., Li G., An T. // Sci. Total Environ. 2020. 720. 137610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137610
- Ponomarev A.V., Ershov B.G. // Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020. V. 54. P. 5331–5344. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00545
补充文件
