Scientific terms as a part of comparative tropes of modern Russian prose

Capa

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

Modern Russian prose is characterized by the active use of scientific terms from different fields of knowledge, which act as images of comparison for comparative tropes. Such tropes are marked by stylistic emphasis, as they contain new information for the addressee. Comparative tropes are defined as metaphors and similes of various structural types. The purpose of our work is to analyze the use of scientific terms as images of comparison for comparative constructions and determine their functions in the texts of modern Russian prose. The material for the study is the works of E. Vodolazkin, A. Ivanov, A. Ilichevsky, A. Matveeva, V. Pelevin, D. Rubina, A. Salnikova, O. Slavnikova, M. Stepnova, O. Vasyakina and others. The article discusses terms in tropes representing different fields of science: physics, chemistry, mathematics, medicine, biology, physiology, linguistics, literary criticism, art history, and computer science. The most active in the comparative tropes of modern prose are biological, medical, physical and computer terms. The productivity of these terms is associated with the rapid development of these areas of knowledge and their role in modern society. Regarding parts of speech, most of them are substantives. By metaphorizing, terms are subject to determinologization. In prose texts, terms often have distributors that clarify, specify or modify the image of comparison. In modern prose, scientific terms as part of tropes perform a number of functions: the function of figurative characteristics of a person, object or phenomenon, the evaluative function, the text-forming and conceptualizing functions. Scientific terms as part of metaphors and similes replenish and update the literature language.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Natalya Nikolina

Moscow Pedagogical State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: admin@riash.ru
Rússia, Moscow

Zoya Petrova

Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: zoyap@mail.ru
Rússia, Moscow

Natalia Fateeva

Vinogradov Russian Language Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: nafata@rambler.ru
Rússia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Barinova E. E. [Scientific term in modern fiction (A. Bitov, N. Baytov, L. Ulitskaya)]. Kritika i semiotika, 2011, no. 15, pp. 197–207. (In Russ.)
  2. Natsional’nyi korpus russkogo yazyka [Russian National Corpus]. Available at: http:// ruscorpora.ru/ (accessed 01.03.2024).
  3. Nemyka A. A., Peshkov A. A. [Terms in the language of fiction: theoretical, functional and linguodidactic aspects]. Istoricheskaya i sotsial’no-obrazovatel’naya mysl’, 2015, vol. 7, no. 5, part 2, pp. 250–253. (In Russ.)
  4. Nikolina N. A., Petrova Z. Yu. [The figurative field “Music” in E. Vodolazkin’s novel “Brisbane”]. Russkaya rech’, 2021, no. 4, pp. 108–119. (In Russ.)
  5. Olontseva S. Eto byl moi sposob vyzhit’. Interv’yu so S. Olontsevoi [This was my way to survive. Interview with S. Olontseva]. Available at: https://polyandria.ru/noage/articles/eto_byl_moy_sposob_vyzhit_intervyu_so_svetlanoy_olontsevoy/?ysclid=lt8pmyi0i1174664365 (accessed: 01.03.2024).
  6. Panaeva E. V. Funktsii spetsial’noi leksiki v khudozhestvennom tekste (na materiale proizvedenii M. A. Bulgakova). Avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Functions of special vocabulary in literary text (based on the works of M. A. Bulgakov). Cand. phil. sci. diss. abstr.]. Moscow, 2005. 25 p.
  7. Razorenov D. A. Termin v sovremennom khudozhestvennom proizvedenii (na materiale angliiskogo yazyka). Avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Term in a modern literary work (based on the English language). Cand. phil. sci. diss. abstr.]. Moscow, 2006. 25 p.
  8. Samokhina A. A. [Theoretical aspects of the functioning of a term in a literary text]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gos. un-ta im. A. S. Pushkina, no. 4, vol. 1. Filologiya. St. Petersburg, 2011, pp. 167–176. (In Russ.)
  9. Shelov S. D. [Once again about the definition of the concept of “term”]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo, 2010, no. 4 (2), pp. 795–799. (In Russ.)
  10. Valgina N. S. Aktivnye protsessy v sovremennom russkom yazyke: Uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vuzov [Active processes in modern Russian: A textbook for university students]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2003. 304 p.
  11. Zhidkova Yu. B. Funktsionirovanie meditsinskoi terminologii v khudozhestvennykh proizvedeniyakh russkikh pisatelei XIX — nachala XXI vekov (na materiale prozy A. P. Chekhova, V. V. Veresaeva, M. A. Bulgakova, Yu. P. Germana, V. P. Aksenova, L. E. Ulitskoi). Avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Functioning of medical terminology in the literary works of Russian writers of the 19th — early 21th centuries (based on the prose of A. P. Chekhov, V. V. Veresaev, M. A. Bulgakov, Yu. P. German, V. P. Aksenov, L. E. Ulitskaya). Cand. phil. sci. diss. abstr.]. Voronezh, 2008. 25 p.

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2024