Synthesis and Ionic Conductivity of Complex Phosphates Li1 + xTi1.8 – xFexGe0.2(PO4)3 with NASICON Structure

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Phosphates Li1 + xTi1.8 – xFexGe0.2(PO4)3 (x = 0.1–0.3) with the NASICON structure have been prepared and studied for the first time. It has been shown that co-doping with germanium and iron leads to significant increase in the ionic conductivity of the prepared materials at low degrees of titanium substitution. The influence of the synthesis method (solid-state and sol-gel) and conditions of precursor processing on the ionic conductivity of the materials has been studied. Optimum conditions for the mechanical processing of precursors have been found to obtain ceramics with the highest conductivity. Li1.2Ti1.6Fe0.2Ge0.2(PO4)3 prepared by the solid-state method exhibits the highest ionic conductivity at room temperature (1.7 × 10–4 S/cm) among all samples.

About the authors

I. A. Stenina

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: stenina@igic.ras.ru
119991, Moscow, Russia

E. O. Taranchenko

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences; National Research University Higher School of Economics, Chemistry Department

Email: stenina@igic.ras.ru
119991, Moscow, Russia; 117312, Moscow, Russia

A. B. Ilin

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: stenina@igic.ras.ru
119991, Moscow, Russia

A. B. Yaroslavtsev

Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: stenina@igic.ras.ru
119991, Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Manthiram A., Yu X., Wang S. // Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017. V. 2. P. 16103. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.103
  2. Zheng F., Kotobuki M., Song S. et al. // J. Power Sources. 2018. V. 389. P. 198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.022
  3. Chinnam P.R., Clymer R.N., Jalil A.A. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2015. V. 27. P. 5479. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00940
  4. Li Q., Chen J., Fan L. et al. // Green Energy Environ. 2016. V. 1. P. 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2016.04.006
  5. Gao Z., Sun H., Fu L. et al. // Adv. Mater. 2018. V. 30. P. 1705702. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201705702
  6. Prakash P., Fall B., Aguirre J. et al. // Nat. Mater. 2023. V. 22. P. 627. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-023-01508-1
  7. Hou M., Liang F., Chen K. et al. // Nanotechnol. 2020. V. 31. P. 132003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/ab5be7
  8. Hossain E., Faruque H., Sunny M. et al. // Energies. 2020. V. 13. P. 3651. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13143651
  9. Voropaeva D.Yu., Safronova E.Yu., Novikova S.A. et al. // Mendeleev Commun. 2022. V. 32. P. 287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mencom.2022.05.001
  10. Zhang C., Wei Y.-L., Cao P.-F. et al. // Renew. Sustain Energy Rev. 2018. V. 82. P. 3091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.030
  11. Wang L., Li J., Lu G. et al. // Front. Mater. 2020. V. 7. P. 111. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.00111
  12. Duan H., Oluwatemitope F., Wu S. et al. // ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020. V. 12. P. 52271. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c16966
  13. Subramanian K., Alexander G.V., Karthik K. et al. // J. Energy Storage. 2021. V. 33. P. 102157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.102157
  14. Bachman J.C., Muy S., Grimaud A. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2016. V. 116. P. 140.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00563
  15. Куншина Г.Б., Бочарова И.В., Щербина О.Б. // Неорган. материалы. 2022. Т. 58. С. 155.
  16. Stenina I.A., Pinus I.Yu., Rebrov A.I. et al. // Solid State Ionics. 2004. V. 175. № 1–4. P. 445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2003.12.037
  17. Fang Y., Zhang J., Xiao L. et al. // Adv. Sci. 2017. V. 4. P. 1600392. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201600392
  18. Thirupathi R., Kumari V., Chakrabarty S. et al. // Progr. Mater. Sci. 2023. V. 137. P. 101128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101128
  19. Aono H., Sugimoto E., Sadaoka Y. et al. // J. Electrochem. Soc. 1990. V. 137. P. 1023. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2086597
  20. Kahlaoui R., Arbi K., Sobrados I. et al. // Inorg. Chem. 2017. V. 56. P. 1216. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b02274
  21. Arbi K., Lazarraga M.G., Chehimi D.B.H. et al. // Chem. Mater. 2004. V. 16. P. 255. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm030422i
  22. Свитанько А.И., Новикова С.А., Стенина И.А. и др. // Неорган. материалы. 2014. Т. 50. С. 295. [Svitan’ko A.I., Novikova S.A., Stenina I.A. et al. // Inorg. Mater. 2014. V. 50. P. 273.] https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020168514030145
  23. Куншина Г.Б., Громов О.Г., Локшин Э.П., Калинников В.Т. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2014. Т. 59. С. 589. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0044457X14050122
  24. Xiao W., Wang J., Fan L. et al. // Energy Storage Mater. 2019. V. 19. P. 379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2018.10.012
  25. Perez-Estebanez M., Isasi-Marin J., Tobbens D.M. et al. // Solid State Ionics. 2014. V. 266. P. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2014.07.018
  26. Zhang P., Matsui M., Hirano A. et al. // Solid State Ionics. 2013. V. 253. P. 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2013.09.022
  27. Stenina I., Pyrkova A., Yaroslavtsev A. // Batteries. 2023. V. 9. № 1. P. 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9010059
  28. Safanama D., Adams S. // J. Power Sources. 2017. V. 340. P. 294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.076
  29. Rettenwander D., Welzl A., Pristat S. et al. // J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016. V. 4. P. 1506. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA08545D
  30. Wu P., Zhou W., Su X. et al. // Adv. Energy Mater. 2023. V. 13. P. 2203440. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202203440
  31. Медведева А.Е., Махонина Е.В., Печень Л.С. и др. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2022. Т. 67. С. 896. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X22070157
  32. Лапшин О.В., Болдырева Е.В., Болдырев В.В. // Журн. неорган. химии. 2021. Т. 66. С. 402. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0044457X21030119
  33. Yaroslavtsev A.B. // Solid State Ionics. 2005. V. 176. P. 2935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2005.09.025
  34. DeWees R., Wang H. // ChemSusChem. 2019. V. 12. P. 3713. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201900725
  35. Paolella A., Zhu W., Campanella D. et al. // Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2022. V. 36. P. 101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coelec.2022.101108
  36. Курзина Е.А., Стенина И. А., Dalvi А. и др. // Неорган. Материалы. 2021. Т. 57. № 10. С. 1094. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002337X21100079
  37. Yaroslavtsev A., Stenina I. // Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2006. V. 51. Suppl. 1. P. S97. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023606130043

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2.

Download (238KB)
Indexing metadata
3.

Download (5MB)
Indexing metadata
4.

Download (249KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2023 И.А. Стенина, Е.О. Таранченко, А.Б. Ильин, А.Б. Ярославцев