Bulk properties of the water-urea-choline chloride system

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

The available experimental data on the solution densities of two binary subsystems, viz. water — choline chloride and urea — choline chloride, and the ternary water — urea — choline chloride system are analyzed. The parameters of the Pitzer-Simonson-Clegg bulk model describing the experimental values of molar volumes of solutions of both binary subsystems and ternary system one function Vm = f(T, p, x1, x2) in the temperature range from 278.15 to 363.15 K and the pressure range from 0.1 to 50 MPa are determined. In the course of thermodynamic modeling, the dependence of the molar volume of choline chloride melt on the state parameters (p, T) is proposed. The obtained model parameters describing binary interactions in the water — choline chloride and urea — choline chloride subsystems can be used to model bulk properties of solvents with deep eutectic of different component composition.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

D. Kalinyuk

M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: kalinyukda@my.msu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7758-9445

Department of Chemistry

Ресей, Moscow, 119991

E. Selezeneva

Mari State University

Email: kalinyukda@my.msu.ru
Ресей, Yoshkar-Ola, 424001

D. Yumakov

Mari State University

Email: kalinyukda@my.msu.ru
Ресей, Yoshkar-Ola, 424001

G. Kosova

Mari State University; Volga State University of Technology

Email: kalinyukda@my.msu.ru
Ресей, Yoshkar-Ola, 424001; Yoshkar-Ola, 424000

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Smith E.L., Abbott A.P., Ryder K.S. // Chem. Rev. 2014. V. 114. № 21. Р. 11060.
  2. Shahbaz K., Mjalli F.S., Gholamreza V.-N. et al. // J. Mol. Liq. 2016. V. 222. Р. 61.
  3. Chen W. Xue Zh., Wang J. et al. // Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 2018. V. 34 № 8. Р. 904.
  4. Delgado-Mellado N., Larriba M., Navarro P. et al. // J. Mol. Liq. 2018. V. 260. Р. 37.
  5. Hansen B.B., Spittle St., Chen B. et al. // Chem. Rev. 2020. V. 121. № 3. Р. 1232.
  6. Wen Q., Chen J.-X., Tang Yu-L. et al. // Chemosphere. 2015. V. 132. Р. 63.
  7. El Achkar T., Greige-Gerges H., Fourmentin S. // Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021. V. 19. Р. 3397.
  8. Abbott A.P., Capper G., Davies D.L. et al. // J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2006. V. 51 № 4. Р. 1280.
  9. Abbott A.P., Capper G., Davies D.L. et al. // Chem. Commun. 2003. V. 1. Р. 70.
  10. Isaifan R.J., Amhamed A. // Adv. Chem. 2018. V. 2018 № 1. Р. 2675659.
  11. Frauenkron M., Melder J.-P., Ruider G. et al. // J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 2012. V. 413. Р. 406.
  12. Mangiacapre E., Castiglione F., Aristotile M.D. et al. // J. Mol. Liq. 2023. V. 383. Р. 22120.
  13. Shaukat S., Buchner R. // J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2011. V. 56. № 12. Р. 4944.
  14. Agieienko V., Buchner R. // Ibid. 2019. V. 64. № 11. Р. 4763.
  15. Gilmore M., Swadzba-Kwasny M., Holbrey J.D. // J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2019. V. 64. № 12. Р. 5248.
  16. Leron R.B., Li M.H. // J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2012. V. 54. Р. 293.
  17. Shah D., Mjalli F.S. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014. V. 16. № 43. Р. 23900.
  18. Shekaari H., Zafarani-Moattar M. T., Mohammadi B. // J. Mol. Liq. 2017. V. 243. Р. 451.
  19. Xie Y., Dong H., Zhang S. et al. // J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2014. V. 59. № 11. Р. 3344.
  20. Yadav A., Pandey S. // J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2014. V. 59. № 7. Р. 2221.
  21. Zhekenov T., Toksanbayev N., Kazakbayeva Z. et al. // Fluid Phase Equilib. 2017. V. 441. Р. 43.
  22. Su W.C., Wong D.S. H., Li M.H. // J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2009. V. 54. № 6. Р. 1951.
  23. Haghbakhsh R., Raeissi S. // J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2018. V. 124. Р. 10.
  24. Dhingra D., Bhawna B., Pandey S. // J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2019. V. 130. Р. 166.
  25. Chemat F., Anjum H., Shariff A.M. et al. // J. Mol. Liq. 2016. V. 218. Р. 301.
  26. Mjalli F.S., Jabbar N.M. A. // Fluid Phase Equilib. 2014. V. 381. Р. 71.
  27. Kosova D.A., Voskov A.L., Uspenskaya I.A. // J. Solution Chem. 2016. V. 45. Р. 1182.
  28. Wagner W., Pruß A. // J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 2002. V. 31. № 2. Р. 387.
  29. Voskov A.L., Kovalenko N.A. // Fluid Phase Equilib. 2020. V. 507. Р. 112419.
  30. Senko M.E., Templeton D.H. // Acta Crystallogr. 1960. V. 13. № 4. Р. 281.
  31. Tischer S., Börnhorst M., Amsler J. et al. // Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019. V. 21. № 30. Р. 16785. 10.1039/C9CP01529A
  32. Dana A.G., Shter G.E., Grader G.S. // RSC Adv. 2014. V. 4. № 66.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу
2. Fig. 1. Gibbs-Rosebohm triangle of the water-urea-choline chloride (ChCh) system. Symbols are compositions for which solution densities have been measured experimentally in the temperature range from 278.15 to 363.15 K and pressure range from 0.1 to 50 MPa.

Жүктеу (107KB)
Метадеректер
3. Fig. 2. Excess molar volume (Vex) of the water – choline chloride system calculated using the PSC model (2); xChCh is the molar fraction of choline chloride.

Жүктеу (138KB)
Метадеректер
4. Fig. 3. Relative deviations (δ) of experimentally determined molar volumes of solutions (symbols) of the water – choline chloride system [12, 13] from those calculated according to (2); xChCh is the molar fraction of choline chloride; dotted lines are the average value of the relative deviation (0.3%).

Жүктеу (178KB)
Метадеректер
5. Fig. 4. Relative deviations (δ) of experimentally determined molar volumes of a solution of the eutectic composition of the urea - choline chloride system (symbols) [14-21, 23-26] from those calculated according to (2); T is the temperature; dashed lines are the average value of the relative deviation (0.2%). The data from [17] (●), [21] (Δ) and [26] (◊) were excluded from the approximation.

Жүктеу (133KB)
Метадеректер
6. Fig. 5. Densities (d) of the water – urea – choline chloride system at T = 303.15 K and p = 0.1 MPa, obtained for solutions with a molar ratio of urea to choline chloride of 2:1: symbols are experimental data, line is the values ​​calculated according to (2). Data from [17] (○) and [21] (□, composition with xreline = 1) were excluded from the approximation. xreline is the molar fraction of 2(NH2)2CO: ChCh.

Жүктеу (125KB)
Метадеректер
7. Fig. 6. Average values ​​of relative deviations (δ) of experimentally determined molar volumes of solutions of the water-urea-choline chloride system from those calculated according to (2) depending on the external pressure (p): dark gray — [16], light gray — average values ​​according to data from [14, 16, 18–21]. The dotted line is the average value of the relative deviation for all experimental data included in the approximation (0.7%).

Жүктеу (125KB)
Метадеректер
8. Fig. 7. Average values ​​of relative deviations (δ) of experimentally determined molar volumes of solutions of the water-urea-choline chloride system from those calculated according to (2) depending on temperature (T). The dotted line is the average value of the relative deviation for all experimental data included in the approximation (0.7%) [14, 16, 18–21].

Жүктеу (147KB)
Метадеректер

© Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025