Variability of resource and coenotic parameters of Vaccinium vitis-idaea (Ericaceae) in artificial Pinetum pleuroziozum stands influenced by the age succession gradient

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Somente assinantes

Resumo

The features of the resource-coenotic parameters variability of Vaccinium vitis-idaea L. coenopopulations in the age series of artificial green moss pine forest (Рinetum pleuroziozum) in the western Belarus (the Grodno Pushcha Nature Rreserve) are shown. The highest resource and coenotic characteristics of V. vitis-idaea (air-dry shoot yield of 8.5–53.8 g/m2) were observed in mature communities with stand transparency of 46–64%, where no intensive forestry measures that radically change the light regime were carried out. Based on the stand transparency, green moss pine forests with V. vitis-idaea coenopopulations are differentiated into two large clusters: densely closed (pole stand; transparency: 17.0–33.0%, with low values of resource and coenotic parameters) and moderately sparse (two subgroups; transparency: 36–98%).

Maximum values of resource-coenotic parameters of V. vitis-idaea coenopopulations are characteristic for mature stands that are divided into two subclusters with different light regimes: stands where no logging was carried out (subcluster 1) with the transparency of 46–64%, and stands after clear-cutting (subcluster 2) with the transparency of 95–98%. The values of the resource-coenotic parameters of coenopopulations are following: in subcluster 1 (no logging) yield – 52 g/m2, height – 7 cm, projective cover – 7%, occurrence – 36%; in subcluster 2 (after clear-cutting) yield – 54 g/m2, height – 10 cm, projective cover – 13%, occurrence – 100%. A sharp change in the light regime exerts the most significant effect on the resource-coenotic parameters of V. vitis-idaea. When performing clear-, successive and other types of fellings that increase the transparency >90%, we recommend that V. vitis-idaea medicinal plant materials be harvested in the amount of the operational stock in the first three years following it. Age classification of forest stands can be used to effectively search for resource-significant biotopes (with V. vitis-idaea).

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

A. Sadkovskaya

Belarusian State University

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: annet.sadkovskaya@mail.ru
Belarus, Minsk

O. Sozinov

Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno

Email: annet.sadkovskaya@mail.ru
Belarus, Grodno

Bibliografia

  1. State forest cadastre of the Republic of Belarus as of 01.01.2024. 2024. Minsk. 87 р. https://belgosles.by/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/кадастр-Республика-на-01.01.2024.pdf (Accessed 11.02.2025) (In Russian)
  2. State Pharmacopoeia of the Republic of Belarus. General and private monographs. 2007. Vol. II. Minsk. 471 р. http://www.fptl.ru/biblioteka/farmacop/bel-2.pdf (Accessed 11.02.2025) (In Russian)
  3. Chirkova N. Yu., Egoshina T. L. 2007. [Demographic characteristics of coenopopulations of Vаccinium vitis-idaea L. in the southern taiga forests of the Kirov region]. — Vestnik of the Orenburg State University. 12: 96–101. https://www.elibrary.ru/ijnbbr (In Russian)
  4. [The State pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation. XIV-th edition]. 2018. Moscow. 7019 р. https://femb.ru/record/pharmacopea14 (Accessed 11.02.2025) (In Russian)
  5. Elin E. Ya., Meshcherikov G. I. 1973. [Atlas of forest indicator plants of Ukraine]. Kyiv. 288 р. (In Russian)
  6. Balandina T. P., Vakhrameeva M. G. 1978. [Lingonberry]. — In: [Biological flora of the Moscow region]. Vol. 4. Moscow. P. 167–178. (In Russian)
  7. Morozov O. V. 2006. [Lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) in pine forests of Belarus]. Minsk. 114 p. (In Russian)
  8. Egorova N. Yu., Egoshina T. L. 2021. Effect of eco-coenotic factors on the resources of Vaccinium vitis-idaea (Ericaceae) in southern taiga subzone (Kirov Region). — Rastitelnye resursy. 57(3): 211–223. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0033994621030031 (In Russian)
  9. Grochowski W. 1981. Jadalne owoce leśne. Warszawa. 243 s. (In Polish)
  10. [Technical code of practice. Sustainable forest management and forest use. Rules for identifying forest types. TСP 587–2016 (33090). Introduced 26.09.16.]. 2016. Minsk. № 16. 48 р.
  11. Yurkevich I. D., Lovchij N. F. 1984. [Pine forests of Belarus: Types, associations, productivity]. Minsk. 176 p. (In Russian)
  12. Paal’ T. V., Paal’ Ya. L.1989. [Structure of lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) coenopopulations]. Tallinn. 212 p. (In Russian)
  13. Myakushko V. K., Vol’vach F. V. 1989. [Ecology of pine forests]. Kyiv. 248 p. (In Russian)
  14. Lovchij N. F. 2009. [Cadastre of pine forest types in the Belarusian Poozerie]. Minsk. 194 p. https://www.iprbookshop.ru/12301.html (Accessed 11.02.2025) (In Russian)
  15. Lovchij N. F. 2012. [Cadastre of pine forest types in the Belarusian Polesie]. Minsk. 220 p. https://www.iprbookshop.ru/11512.html (Accessed 11.02.2025) (In Russian)
  16. [On the State program “Belarusian Forest” for 2021–2025]. https://pravo.by/document/?guid=3871&p0=C22100052 (Accessed 11.02.2025) (In Russian)
  17. Matveyko A. P. 2015. Forest resources of the Republic of Belarus and its utalization. — Trudy BGTU. 2(175): 76–78. https://www.elibrary.ru/wmshuf (In Russian)
  18. Budantsev A. L., Kharitonova N. P. 1999. [Resource studies of medicinal plants]. St. Petersburg. 56 р. (In Russian)
  19. Egorov A. A. 2015. [Botanical resource studies: Methodological guidelines for the students of the “Forestry” educational program 35.03.01]. St. Petersburg. 36 р. (In Russian)
  20. Sysoj I. P. 2019. [Productivity and sustainability of medicinal plants of the natural flora of the northern part of Belarus (example of model species population): Abstr. … Dis. Cand. (Biology) Sci.]. Minsk. 31 p. (In Russian)
  21. Egorov A. A., Sozinov O. V., Buzuk G. N., Grummo L. G. 2023. [Botanical resource studies: classification and assessment of useful plant reserves]. St. Petersburg. 100 р. (In Russian)
  22. Unguryanu T. N., Grjibovski A. M. 2014. Analysis of three independent groups using non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test in STATA software. — Ekologiya cheloveka (Human Ecology). 21(6): 55–58. https://www.elibrary.ru/sepulv (In Russian)
  23. Sushko G. G. 2023. [Biometrics: a tutorial]. Vitebsk. 110 р. https://rep.vsu.by/handle/123456789/37708 (Accessed 11.02.2025) (In Russian)
  24. Hammer O., Harper D. A.T., Ryan P. D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. — Palaeontol. Electron. 4(1): 4A. https://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm
  25. Sushko G. G. 2020. Methods of multivariate data analysis in insects synecology. — Journal of the Belarusian State University. Ecology. 1: 38–45. https://www.elibrary.ru/krzgqm (In Russian)
  26. Kurlovich L. E., Pankov V. B., Kivileva I. M. 2015. Silvicultural activitie impacts on food and medicinal plant condition and productivity. — Forestry Information. 2: 24–32. https://elibrary.ru/txkxjz (In Russian)
  27. Grodno region, Grodno district, State Forestry Institution “Grodno forestry”. Avgustovskoye forestry. Forest management. Minsk. Ministry of Forestry of the Republic of Belarus. RUE “Belgosles”. 2017. (In Russian)
  28. Kuzmichova N. A., Buzuk G. N., Lamaka E. V. 2015. Linear and non-linear dependency between productivity and projective covering of medicinal plants. — Vestnik Farmatsii. 1(67): 24–28. https://elibrary.ru/tqssfd (In Russian)
  29. Shevlyakov E. A., Trishin E. G., Konevina K. S., Farber S. K. 2007. The impact of clear-cutting on the restoration of pine forests in the Angara region (using the example of the Motyginsky branch of the lease base of Lesosibirsky LDK-1 OJSC). — Conifers of the Boreal Area. 24(4–5): 373–377. https://elibrary.ru/juikox (In Russian)
  30. Sadkovskaya A. I., Sozinov. O.V. 2019. [Variability of species composition of moss pine forests of different ages]. — In: [All-Russian conference “Modern science of vegetation”, dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the Department of Geobotany of the Faculty of Biology of Moscow State University. Conference abstracts]. Moscow. P. 54–56. https://elib.grsu.by/doc/54873 (Accessed 11.02.2025) (In Russian)
  31. Onipchenko V. G. 2013. [Functional phytocoenology: Synecology of plants]. Moscow. 576 p. (In Russian)
  32. Alekseev V. A.1975. [Forest light patterns]. Leningrad. 225 p. (In Russian)
  33. Mikhaleva L. G., Chikidov I. I. 2022. Current state of pine forests of the Bestyakh terrace (the Lena-Amga interfluve, Central Yakutia). — Arctic and Subarctic Natural Resources. 27(1): 109–118. https://doi.org/10.31242/2618-9712-2022-27-1-109-118 (In Russian)
  34. Gedyh V. B. 2004. [The processes of formation of Vacciniaceae family wild berry shrubs in the forests of Belarus: Abstr. … Dis. Doct. (Biology) Sci.]. Gomel. 38 р. (In Russian)
  35. Kurilovich T. V. 2015. [Lingonberry: cultivation as an alternative to harvesting raw materials in natural habitats]. — In: Proceedings of the Fourth International scientific and practical Internet conference “Medicinal herbs: from past experience to modern technologies”. Poltava. P. 118–122. https://www.academia.edu/28540478 (Accessed 11.02.2025) (In Russian)
  36. Sozinov O. V. 2018. [Phytoindication in botanical resource studies: qualitative and quantitative characteristics of medicinal plants on ecological-coenotic gradients: Abstr. … Dis. Doct. (Biology) Sci.]. St. Petersburg. 42 p. (In Russian)
  37. Laboha K. V., Luferov A. O., Karas A. N. 2020. Current state of pine forests in Belarus. — Proceedings of BSTU. Ser. 1. Forestry. Nature Management. Processing of Renewable Resources. 1(228): 28–38. https://journals.belstu.by/index.php/first/228-5 (In Russian)
  38. Paal’ T. V., Paal’ Ya. L. 1980. Age structure of aboveground shoots of lingonberry. — Rastitelnye Resursy. 16(1): 32–38. (In Russian)
  39. Obydyonnikov V. I., Klyuchnikov I. L. 1998. [The problem of preserving, renewing and increasing the productivity of berry coenopopulations in relation to forestry systems]. — Lesnoy Vestnik. 3: 89–98. https://elibrary.ru/hvptwz (In Russian)
  40. Ulanova N. G., Zhmylev P. Yu. 2014. [Ecological and coenotic analysis of plant communities: A tutorial]. Moscow. 80 р.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar
2. Fig. 1. Frequency of significant differences in resource-coenotic parameters of Vaccinium vitis-idaea coenopopulations for the entire study period (а) and their interannual variability (b) in artificial green moss pine forests (Pinetum pleuroziozum) with stands of different age classes.

Baixar (126KB)
Metadados
3. Fig. 2. Ordination (PCoA) of Vaccinium vitis-idaea coenopopulations by productivity in artificial green moss Scots pine forest (Pinetum pleuroziozum) with different stand age classes (а–e) and all stand age classes (f).

Baixar (381KB)
Metadados
4. Fig. 3. Grouping of artificial green moss pine forests (Pinetum pleuroziozum) according to the forest stand transparency. Horizontally: Euclidian distance, y-axis: age of the stand, years.

Baixar (136KB)
Metadados

Declaração de direitos autorais © Russian Academy of Sciences, 2025